[118350] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cord MacLeod)
Mon Oct 19 21:27:52 2009
From: Cord MacLeod <cordmacleod@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <63ac96a50910191822r27b011dh633f661527f7ed5c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:27:06 -0700
To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
The tool is aware of the prefix length you insert. So instead of /32,
put /64 or /48 etc.
On Oct 19, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Simon Perreault <
> simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
>
>> Esposito, Victor wrote, on 2009-10-19 16:01:
>>> Since there is a lot of conversation about IPv6 flying about, does
>>> anyone have a document or link to a good high level allocation
>>> structure
>>> for v6?
>>
>> See RFC 3531 and here:
>>
>> http://www.ipv6book.ca/allocation.html
>>
>
>> Simon
>>
>
> I'm sure I'm just dumb, but no matter what numbers I put into that
> tool, it only spits out a series of /32s on the HTML output. That
> doesn't seem terribly useful, as most of us aren't going to be
> allocating
> multiple /32s, we'll be splitting up a single /32 into smaller bits.
>
> Matt
