[118346] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Science vs. bullshit
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Mon Oct 19 19:09:12 2009
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:08:07 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <E47F5FB6-2FAB-4886-8A9D-1CF2B7A8961F@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> Corner cases like the one above are barely noise, so the curve it
> still valid.
Strictly speaking, with the subject of "Science vs bullshit", you and msa
have named a hypothesis, no? Can either of you think of a way to disprove
that, and if so, where's your data? :)
Adrian
