[118364] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Science vs. bullshit

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Oct 20 10:37:48 2009

Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:36:10 -0400
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Jim Cowie <cowie@renesys.com>
In-Reply-To: <6762a99d0910191659q765fe7a2s489f2ceb25dbe127@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

> The thing about the data I presented, however, is that it is _differential_
> ... it says "set your knobs, look at four days over four years, and let's
> see if the migration among populations seems consistent."

as we discussed this morning, this has the problem of not knowing how
much of the change is in the lens through which you are looking and how
much is in that at which you are looking.

bgp is way too damned good at information hiding.

randy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post