[118319] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (sthaug@nethelp.no)
Mon Oct 19 12:28:16 2009
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:27:13 +0200 (CEST)
To: morrowc.lists@gmail.com, serge@nbnet.nb.ca
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <75cb24520910190852j79f87836ya18b84854096440f@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> > We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the=
IGP. I'm told
> > OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are l=
ooking at=A0using
> =
> you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF?
I was thinking the same. If you run OSPF and want IPv6 some time in
the future you'll need to run OSPFv3 in addition. Much simpler to just
run IS-IS from day 1 and be done.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
