[118317] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Maximum devices in OSPF area 0
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Oct 19 11:53:13 2009
In-Reply-To: <101360.13674.qm@web53608.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:52:15 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Serge Vautour <serge@nbnet.nb.ca>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serge Vautour <sergevautour@yahoo.ca> wro=
te:
> Hello,
>
> We are looking to deploy a greenfield MPLS network with OSPF as the IGP. =
I'm told
> OSPF areas don't play well with OSPF TED. For this reason, we are looking=
at=A0using
you said .. greenfield.. why use OSPF?
> only area 0.=A0Only Loopback interfaces and p-p core=A0ethernet links wil=
l be
> in=A0OSPF.=A0What are the maximum number of Routers & Links that folks wo=
uld be
> comfortable with putting in 1 area?=A0If folks are already using this typ=
e of approach,
> could you share your current numbers?
>
> Thanks,
> Serge
>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0______________________________________________________________=
____
> Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo=
! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
>
>
