[117358] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Iannone)
Thu Sep 10 13:22:22 2009
In-Reply-To: <15D7FD88-869C-46B1-A5EB-C941E08C97F6@illinois.edu>
From: Jason Iannone <jason.iannone@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:20:52 -0600
To: "Buraglio, Nicholas D" <buraglio@illinois.edu>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I would say confeds are more appropriate for larger ibgp networks.
You can have reflectors inside confederations. See the BGP chapter of
the JNCIP book.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Buraglio, Nicholas D
<buraglio@illinois.edu> wrote:
> Lots of things can be used to determine how you decide to set up your
> BGP peers. =A0https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/documentation/techdoc=
s/downloads/pdf/350010.pdf
> =A0has a decent amount of information on some of the differences that
> can help you decide how to set up your peerings.
>
> nb
>
> ---
> Nick Buraglio
> Network Engineer, CITES, University of Illinois
> GPG key 0x2E5B44F4
> Phone: 217.244.6428
> buraglio@illinois.edu
>
> On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:52 PM, devang patel wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> What are the advantages of BGP Confederation over Route Reflector? I
>> mean
>> when one should decide to deploy BGP Confederation over Route
>> Reflector
>> deployment?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Devang Patel
>>
>
>
>
