[117352] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Buraglio, Nicholas D)
Thu Sep 10 11:33:53 2009
From: "Buraglio, Nicholas D" <buraglio@illinois.edu>
To: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:33:01 -0500
In-Reply-To: <d0fea3580909091952r4fceffa4ocab2fcf928b30e93@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Lots of things can be used to determine how you decide to set up your =20
BGP peers. https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/documentation/techdocs/do=
wnloads/pdf/350010.pdf=20
has a decent amount of information on some of the differences that =20
can help you decide how to set up your peerings.
nb
---
Nick Buraglio
Network Engineer, CITES, University of Illinois
GPG key 0x2E5B44F4
Phone: 217.244.6428
buraglio@illinois.edu
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:52 PM, devang patel wrote:
> Hello,
> What are the advantages of BGP Confederation over Route Reflector? I =20
> mean
> when one should decide to deploy BGP Confederation over Route =20
> Reflector
> deployment?
>
> Thanks,
> Devang Patel
>
