[116347] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Fri Jul 31 18:23:31 2009
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <200907312200.n6VM00px043598@wattle.apnic.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:22:37 -0400
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jul 31, 2009, at 6:00 PM, cidr-report@potaroo.net wrote:
> Recent Table History
> Date Prefixes CIDR Agg
> 24-07-09 298785 182835
> 25-07-09 299168 182751
> 26-07-09 298909 182973
> 27-07-09 299265 183099
> 28-07-09 299345 183207
> 29-07-09 299380 182987
> 30-07-09 299354 183395
> 31-07-09 299904 183680
Only 94 prefixes short!
Any bets on whether next tomorrow is THREE HUNDRED (thousand) day?
Careful what you say, we actually dropped prefixes Wed -> Thurs this
week.
How many router will have blood spattered over them?
<http://www.gerardbutler.net/300/images/300-logo.png>
:-)
--
TTFN,
patrick
