[116357] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoff Huston)
Sat Aug 1 05:27:25 2009
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Paul_Rolland_=28=E3=83=9D=E3=83=BC=E3=83=AB=E3=83=BB?=
=?UTF-8?Q?=E3=83=AD=E3=83=A9=E3=83=B3=29?= <rol@witbe.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090801104436.28cc8dd9@tux.DEF.witbe.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:27:06 +1000
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 01/08/2009, at 6:44 PM, Paul Rolland (=E3=83=9D=E3=83=BC=E3=83=AB=E3=83=
=BB=E3=83=AD=E3=83=A9=E3=83=B3) wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:22:37 -0400
> "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 31, 2009, at 6:00 PM, cidr-report@potaroo.net wrote:
>>
>>> Recent Table History
>>> Date Prefixes CIDR Agg
>>> 24-07-09 298785 182835
>>> 25-07-09 299168 182751
>>> 26-07-09 298909 182973
>>> 27-07-09 299265 183099
>>> 28-07-09 299345 183207
>>> 29-07-09 299380 182987
>>> 30-07-09 299354 183395
>>> 31-07-09 299904 183680
>>
>> Only 94 prefixes short!
> You mean 96, or is 299998 important to you ? ;)
>
>> Any bets on whether next tomorrow is THREE HUNDRED (thousand) day?
>> Careful what you say, we actually dropped prefixes Wed -> Thurs this
>> week.
> Don't invite people to "leak", you can be sure one of them will try =20=
> to be
> the one who "helped" reach the 300K range :(
done! Right now its 300002 entries from this vantage point.
In amidst the teeming morass of updates of existing announced =20
prefixes, sorting out the exact announcement of a new prefix that took =20=
the table over 300000 entries will take a little time to work out.
Geoff
