[116226] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (chris rollin)
Mon Jul 27 02:41:21 2009
In-Reply-To: <4A6D4859.4040106@trelane.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:41:07 -0500
From: chris rollin <2600hz@gmail.com>
To: trelane@trelane.net
Cc: "nanog - n. am. network ops group list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This only protects ISPs from, upon being served notice, being liable for
content
A majority of the CDA was overturned, as it violates both first and fifth
amendments. What is left of it only applies to ISPs PUBLISHING (*not*
filtering) content
This is Net Neutrality realm
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 23:15 -0700, Shon Elliott wrote:
> >
> >> Okay, so how do YOU block the attacks from eating up your bandwidth
> >> and filling
> >> up your logs without blocking the entire IP?
> >>
> >
> > If I was AT&T, I would purchase DDoS filtering equipment and run it at
> > edge where all of my traffic is peering anyway.
> >
> > This discussion is about AT&T, not you.
> >
> > William
> >
> While I agree, I certainly believe that due to the nature of some of the
> content
> on 4chan, AT&T can make a strong "Good Samaritan" claim under 47USC230.
> There's
> always TOR.
>
>
> Andrew D Kirch
>
>
