[116225] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shon Elliott)
Mon Jul 27 02:37:47 2009
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:37:33 -0700
From: Shon Elliott <shon@unwiredbb.com>
CC: "nanog@nanog.org >> nanog" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <e34bd1c70907262325p71e90627k5fbf6e54a2ab0ed8@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Chris,
Have you even read any of the other posts on here. I have been talking about
spoofed packets in this thread multiple times. I do know what it is. I would
appreciate you not making stupid comments like that.
chris rollin wrote:
> Apparently not
>
> Back to the kids' table !
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:38 AM, William Pitcock
> <nenolod@systeminplace.net <mailto:nenolod@systeminplace.net>> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 20:05 -0700, Shon Elliott wrote:
> > There has been alot of customers on our network who were
> complaining about ACK
> > scan reports coming from 207.126.64.181. We had no choice but to
> block that
> > single IP until the attacks let up.
>
> ...have you ever heard of forged packet headers? Just saying.
>
> William
> --
> William Pitcock
> SystemInPlace - Simple Hosting Solutions
> 1-800-688-5018
>
>
>
