[115840] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Request for contact and procedure information
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Fri Jul 10 11:36:59 2009
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:36:31 -0700
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4A573DB4.7030505@olp.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Dan White wrote:
> Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> Dan White wrote:
>>
>>> Have you spoken with your provider? They should be giving you options,
>>> like changing your static address, or null routing the attackers
>>> upstream, or perhaps blocking port 80 to you, to limit your ingress
>>> traffic.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> For DSL? I've never had that kind of luck with SBC's (now AT&T) home
>> products, and I've been using their DSL since 2001. This is one instance
>> where paying the big bucks for at least a T1 can show some some return.
>> Even if it's "business DSL" it's still treated the same as "drooling
>> user DSL".
>>
>> Purely my personal experience.
>>
>> ~Seth
>>
>>
>
> I guess complaining that your provider won't do anything to help you,
> and not calling them to find out otherwise is a self fulfilling prophecy.
>
Can you read? Did I say that?
~Seth
