[115846] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Request for contact and procedure information
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Fri Jul 10 12:07:37 2009
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:06:39 -0700
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: Dan White <dwhite@olp.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A57653C.5080405@olp.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Dan White wrote:
> Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> Dan White wrote:
>>
>>> Seth Mattinen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dan White wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Have you spoken with your provider? They should be giving you options,
>>>>> like changing your static address, or null routing the attackers
>>>>> upstream, or perhaps blocking port 80 to you, to limit your ingress
>>>>> traffic.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> For DSL? I've never had that kind of luck with SBC's (now AT&T) home
>>>> products, and I've been using their DSL since 2001. This is one instance
>>>> where paying the big bucks for at least a T1 can show some some return.
>>>> Even if it's "business DSL" it's still treated the same as "drooling
>>>> user DSL".
>>>>
>>>> Purely my personal experience.
>>>>
>>>> ~Seth
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I guess complaining that your provider won't do anything to help you,
>>> and not calling them to find out otherwise is a self fulfilling prophecy.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Can you read? Did I say that?
>>
>> ~Seth
>>
>>
> Seth,
>
> This was obviously not a response to you, but to the original poster.
>
Sorry, I read that as a response to my message.
~Seth
