[113892] in North American Network Operators' Group
IPv6 Operators List (which also covers 6to4 operation ;) (Was: IPv4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Thu Apr 23 00:36:28 2009
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:36:02 +0200
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: Shin SHIRAHATA <true@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20090423094423.033F.94DBBD5E@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig9F2EE1D53BF1084D5563B57C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Shin SHIRAHATA wrote:
>>> 192.88.99.0/24, 2002::/16, and 2001::/32 are some
>>> notable examples of heterogeneous origin AS.
>> And those prefixes (6to4 & Teredo) all come with annoying problems as
>> one never knows which relay is really being used and it is hard to deb=
ug
>> how the packets really flow.
>=20
> I agree entirely.=20
>=20
> As a one of 6to4 relay operator (AS38646), I believe coordination amon=
g=20
> 6to4 and Teredo operators is needed.
>=20
> Does anyone know is there any operators group who are using=20
> 192.88.99.0/24, 2002::/16, and 2001::/32?
See http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/
Next to that: whois -h whois.ripe.net RFC3068-MNT
that at at least should give you all the European 6to4 operators directly=
=2E
Greets,
Jeroen
(RPSL is a nice thing isn't it ;)
--------------enig9F2EE1D53BF1084D5563B57C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFJ7/AyKaooUjM+fCMRAgNLAJ9QX+rWhHgyaW2U3OvAtjIf5lcwcwCeMA8p
5fPcZYMq3djYk4BVaSrw/78=
=WsnQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig9F2EE1D53BF1084D5563B57C--
