[113891] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv4 Anycast?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shin SHIRAHATA)
Wed Apr 22 22:18:15 2009
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:17:18 +0900
From: Shin SHIRAHATA <true@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
In-Reply-To: <49EF8BA7.9060700@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> > 192.88.99.0/24, 2002::/16, and 2001::/32 are some
> > notable examples of heterogeneous origin AS.
>
> And those prefixes (6to4 & Teredo) all come with annoying problems as
> one never knows which relay is really being used and it is hard to debug
> how the packets really flow.
I agree entirely.
As a one of 6to4 relay operator (AS38646), I believe coordination among
6to4 and Teredo operators is needed.
Does anyone know is there any operators group who are using
192.88.99.0/24, 2002::/16, and 2001::/32?
---
No caffeine, No work.
Shin SHIRAHATA <shin@shirahata.name> / <true@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
