[113855] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv4 Anycast?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fouant, Stefan)
Wed Apr 22 10:42:45 2009
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:37:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <49EF151C.5020405@brightok.net>
From: "Fouant, Stefan" <Stefan.Fouant@neustar.biz>
To: "Jack Bates" <jbates@brightok.net>,
"Zhenkai Zhu" <zhenkai@ucla.edu>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates@brightok.net]
>=20
> Given that the networks are duplicates, there's no requirement that
> one part of the AS needs to receive routes from the other part of the
> AS. For management and such of the devices, I presume there are
> separate
> netblocks advertised with a different ASN (possibly even statically
> assigned by a hosting network).
Or you could just allow as-loops... not saying it's a good thing, but it
could be done ;)
Stefan Fouant
