[113802] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ricky Beam)
Tue Apr 21 20:26:01 2009
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:24:38 -0400
To: "Chris Adams" <cmadams@hiwaay.net>, nanog@nanog.org
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090421224030.GA1301601@hiwaay.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:40:30 -0400, Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net> wrote:
> SSL and FTP are techincal justifications for an IP per site.
No they aren't. SSL will work just fine as a name-based virtual host with
any modern webserver / browser. (Server Name Indication (SNI) [RFC3546,
sec 3.1])
FTP? Who uses FTP these days? Certainly not consumers. Even Cisco
pushes almost everything via a webserver. (they still have ftp servers,
they just don't put much on them these days.)
