[113750] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Owen)
Mon Apr 20 22:07:38 2009
From: Chris Owen <owenc@hubris.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <8654876D-CEA6-469A-8611-FEE7A943B8BE@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:07:25 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 20, 2009, at 9:04 PM, David Andersen wrote:
> Just a thought: A technical person might be very happy to lie to a =20=
> toothless organization that holds no real sway over him or her, =20
> won't revoke the address space once granted, and for whom the =20
> benefit of lots of address space in which to play exceeds any =20
> potential pain from being caught, er, exaggerating their need for =20
> address space.
>
> That same technical person might be less inclined to lie to a =20
> director of their company who asks: "Are you asking me to attest, =20
> publicly and perhaps legally, that this information is correct? If =20=
> you're wrong and you make an ass of me, it's going to be yours that =20=
> goes out the door."
>
> Seems like a reasonable experiment to try, at least.
I agree there is no harm in the idea but as I was reading the =20
announcement this morning I couldn't help but think "Too little, too =20
late".
Chris
- =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (noun):
President - Wichita (316) 858-3000 - A stupidity tax
Hubris Communications Inc www.hubris.net
- =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Public Key: http://home.hubris.net/owenc/pgpkey.txt
Comment: Public Key ID: 0xB513D9DD
iEYEARECAAYFAkntKl0ACgkQElUlCLUT2d0engCgk3EJW7uu0j9p0ArLjRmZHseP
cLMAnRqYov8CwxkF1E1pxP4zktUhA+HS
=3Di5o1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
