[113479] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Fiber cut in SF area
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Weeks)
Mon Apr 13 16:03:23 2009
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:00:59 -0700
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: surfer@mauigateway.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--- beckman@angryox.com wrote:
>> I still think skipping the securing of manholes and access
>> points in favor of active monitoring with offsite access is a
>> better solution.
>
> The only thing missing from your plan was a cost analysis. Cost of each,
> plus operational costs, * however many of each type. How much would that
> be?
So, let's see. I'm pulling numbers out of my butt here, but basing it on
non-quantity-discounted hardware available off the shelf.
-----------------------------------------
Manpower to design, build, maintain, train folks and monitor in the NOC. Costs of EMS, its maintenance. blah, blah, blah...
scott
