[112864] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Akamai wierdness
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Wall)
Mon Mar 23 10:18:21 2009
In-Reply-To: <385D08D6-35CC-40EF-ACC3-7B5D6E84A27E@ianai.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:18:07 -0500
From: Paul Wall <pauldotwall@gmail.com>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Patrick Gilmore wrote [context inserted]:
> Perhaps using the RFC required address [noc@akamai] would be more
productive than e-mailing 10k strangers?
Normally I see emails like this and, if it's Not In My Back Yard, and the
Internet is not going nutz, the delete key explains how worried i am.
Back to your email:
> using the RFC required address
The correct catty response to the Akamai question is : ccare@akamai.com.
That's C as in "Customer", Care as in "they actually care".
I would end the email there, but it really gets me how someone that is
in-house doesn't realize that noc@akamai is a black hole.
Drive Slow,
-paul
