[112706] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (JC Dill)
Sat Mar 14 17:08:53 2009
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:08:14 -0700
From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20090314203519.GA752337@hiwaay.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Do you think Covad would respond to a DMCA complaint like that?
>
That's actually the one thing that would make sense of this - that they
*do* purge the logs fast enough that they could reply to a DMCA
complaint by saying "sorry, we don't have logs".
The question is, in doing so are they also purging the logs so fast they
can't deal with customers that cause problems for Covad itself? If so,
then they probably aren't purging the logs this fast, they just said so
to avoid having to deal with their customers that are posing problems
for others, and they probably would respond quite differently if it were
a legal matter (where lying equals perjury) rather than just a "complaint".
jc
