[112728] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Mon Mar 16 00:08:03 2009
In-Reply-To: <EDEF6F0D-725A-451B-9D1F-A738C34B6F33@multicasttech.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:07:52 -0400
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
A finely tuned killfile that remains mostly static once defined works
wonders across all threads and fairly well.
Best,
Marty
On 3/15/09, Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Charles Wyble wrote:
>
>> Can we please get this thread closed or something?
>>
>
> Maybe we should start the nanog-law mailing list.
>
>> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 23:17, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net> wrote:
>>>> "Looking around" Rockefeller Center generally isn't a crime.
>>>>
>>>> "Looking around" where you're in my back yard and peeking in the
>>>> windows
>>>> is, at a minimum, trespass, and if our local cops notice you doing
>>>> it, you
>>>> can expect that you may find yourself ... severely inconvenienced.
>>>>
>>>> There is no "freedom to look around" on private property, despite
>>>> what you
>>>> appear to think.
>>> Isn't Rockefeller Center private property? ;-)
>>> -Jim P.
>>
>
>
>
