[112673] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Thu Mar 12 20:37:34 2009
To: ross@dillio.net
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:54:33 CDT."
<c229aa5b01749718e25f61ae579659a3.squirrel@www.dillio.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:33:22 +1100
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
In message <c229aa5b01749718e25f61ae579659a3.squirrel@www.dillio.net>, "Ross" writ
es:
> Whether Covad chooses to enforce their AUP against port scanning is a
> business decision up to them. Again, why worry about things out of your
> control, especially when we are talking about port scanning. I would think
> people have more pressing issues, guess not.
>
> --
> Ross
> ross [at] dillio.net
Well most port scanning is from compromised boxes. Once a
box is compromised it can be used for *any* sort of attack.
If you really care about security you take reports of ports
scans seriously.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
