[112630] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon Lewis)
Wed Mar 11 14:36:27 2009
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:36:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
To: Bill Blackford <BBlackford@nwresd.k12.or.us>
In-Reply-To: <6069A203FD01884885C037F81DD75080CA064DA9@wsc-mail-01.intra.nwresd.k12.or.us>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Bill Blackford wrote:
> I'm trying to evaluate a lower-cost alternative to the 720-3bxl.
> I'm only pushing a few hundred megs of traffic, exchanging a few routes with less than 20 peers and don't see the need for a 720's worth of throughput in the near future.
>
> Can the 32 handle a full table?
No...not unless things have changed and you can get/put a pfc 3bxl on a
sup32.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
