[112600] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: XO peering.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ChrisSerafin)
Tue Mar 10 14:19:05 2009
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:18:44 -0500
From: ChrisSerafin <chris@chrisserafin.com>
To: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090310084159.N18723@clockwork>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Our office has XO, and sent an email out complainging about
Salesforce.....In Chicago.
--chris
Stefan Molnar wrote:
>
> It just cleared up for me. Nice to have a call center complain
> constantly.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
>> wrote:
>>> There was a peering issue in San Jose with XO, that impacted our
>>> operations
>>> this morning. But looks like a side effect is after the hand off to
>>> NTT.
>>> Anyone who has an XO link can reach areas insdie NTT?
>>> As an example our route to Salesforce /21 is via NTT and it is not
>>> happy
>>> right now.
>>
>> This is from a host in XO AS2828
>>
>> I can reach, for example, www.verio.net 204.202.20.3 / AS2914
>> NTT-COMMUNICATIONS-2914 just fine.
>>
>> www.salesforce.com is also reachable, through NTT
>>
>> --
>> Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1993 - Release Date: 03/10/09 07:19:00
>
>
