[112603] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: XO peering.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jake Mertel)
Tue Mar 10 17:20:05 2009
From: Jake Mertel <jake@nobistech.net>
To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>, "Mort, Eric" <EMort@xo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:18:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1236714051.86405.2.camel@slan.es.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I did some preliminary tests static-routing some prefixes that were not wor=
king earlier over our XO connection and everything seemed fine. I went ahea=
d and turned the session back up, no reports of trouble yet. I'll update if=
we have any issues.
--
Regards,
Jake Mertel
Nobis Technology Group, L.L.C.
Web: http://www.nobistech.net/
Phone: (312) 281-5101 ext. 401
Fax: (808) 356-0417
Mail: 201 West Olive Street
Second Floor, Suite 2B
Bloomington, IL 61701
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:oberman@es.net]=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 2:41 PM
To: Mort, Eric
Cc: Jake Mertel; John Martinez; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: XO peering.
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:41 -0500, Mort, Eric wrote:
> We had some hardware issues in San Jose which triggered some other=20
> ugliness. We believe we have the issues mitigated at this time. =20
> Folks still seeing issues are encouraged to hit me up offline.
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Eric J. Mort
> XO Communications
> Sr. Manager - IP Operations
> Desk - 314-787-7826
> Cell - 314.486-9057
> emort@xo.com
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jake Mertel [mailto:jake@nobistech.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:34 AM
> To: John Martinez; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: XO peering.
>=20
> We had a number of issues in the Seattle area this morning, seemed to=20
> be isolated to traffic transiting via Level 3. We were forced to turn=20
> off the connection, and it's still disabled until we get an update from X=
O.
>=20
>=20
> --
> Regards,
>=20
> Jake Mertel
> Nobis Technology Group, L.L.C.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Web: http://www.nobistech.net/
> Phone: (312) 281-5101 ext. 401
> Fax: (808) 356-0417
>=20
> Mail: 201 West Olive Street
> Second Floor, Suite 2B
> Bloomington, IL 61701
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Martinez [mailto:jmartinez@zero11.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:23 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: XO peering.
>=20
> We saw an issue with Level 3 hand off to XO in Chicago.
>=20
> Stefan Molnar wrote:
> >
> > There was a peering issue in San Jose with XO, that impacted our=20
> > operations this morning. But looks like a side effect is after the
> hand
> > off to NTT.
> >
> > Anyone who has an XO link can reach areas insdie NTT?
> >
> > As an example our route to Salesforce /21 is via NTT and it is not
> happy
> > right now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stefan
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
No joy from our (AS293) perspective. I still see traffic to XO at SJ black-=
holed.
eqx-sj-rt1-re1> traceroute 198.17.75.45
traceroute to 198.17.75.45 (198.17.75.45), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets ^C
Works fine from Ashburn, though. I've pref'ed XO down at SJ until it is wor=
king again.
--
R. Kevin Oberman
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-Mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510-486-8634
