[112500] in North American Network Operators' Group
DPI or Flow Management
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Francois Menard)
Sun Mar 1 08:06:09 2009
From: Francois Menard <francois@menards.ca>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <49A99EE3.3050801@ibctech.ca>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:51:19 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
The Coalition of Internet Service Providers has filed a substantial =20
contribution at the CRTC stating:
1) The CRTC should forbid DPI, as it cannot be proven to be 98.5% =20
effective at trapping P2P, such as to guarantee congestion relief
2) The CRTC should allow for other forms of traffic management by =20
ISPs, such as Flow Management
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/public/partvii/2008/8646/c12_200815400/1029835.zip
This is part of the public record at the following address:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/8646/c12_200815400.htm
The world will see Canada taking head-on the issue of addressing the =20
legitimacy of DEEP PACKET INSPECTION as a mean of properly managing an =20=
incumbent's network behind the unbundling/peering interface.
NANOG cannot pretend that this debate does not take place and remain =20
silent on this.
Best regards,
F.
--
Fran=E7ois D. M=E9nard
francois@menards.ca
