[112494] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DPI or Flow Management
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Bertrand)
Sat Feb 28 17:02:36 2009
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:02:19 -0500
From: Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca>
To: Francois Menard <francois@menards.ca>
In-Reply-To: <E6B47F7D-C5C7-4742-94F4-6CFD128DED15@menards.ca>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Francois Menard wrote:
> The Coalition of Internet Service Providers has filed a substantial
> contribution at the CRTC stating:
>
> 1) The CRTC should forbid DPI, as it cannot be proven to be 98.5%
> effective at trapping P2P, such as to guarantee congestion relief
>
> 2) The CRTC should allow for other forms of traffic management by ISPs,
> such as Flow Management
>
> http://www.crtc.gc.ca/public/partvii/2008/8646/c12_200815400/1029835.zip
>
> This is part of the public record at the following address:
>
> http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/8646/c12_200815400.htm
>
> The world will see Canada taking head-on the issue of addressing the
> legitimacy of DEEP PACKET INSPECTION as a mean of properly managing an
> incumbent's network behind the unbundling/peering interface.
>
> NANOG cannot pretend that this debate does not take place and remain
> silent on this.
Francios;
Are you responding directly to my post via an automated filter, or am I
the only one seeing the hijacking of this thread?
Either way, great! I thought that I'd state that I forgot to mention in
my original post that I was considering running HSRP (vrrp) on my core
routers, for the access-layer clients who are not multi-homed.
Given my setup, does RFC3768 at the 'core' make sense?
Steve
