[111982] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Confusion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Feb 17 21:45:40 2009
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:45:33 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <366100670902171827o37ba393btffda3cdd3cc0d7e5@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> cgn is not a transition tool. it is a dangerous hack to deal with
> the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient
> space to number their customer edge.
> Sounds like those consumer ISPs better get started on rolling out
> dual stacks to the CPE.
except that, if you do not have enough ipv4 pace to number your cpe
perimeter, you can't do that.
again, take a look at draft-ymbk-aplusp-02.txt
randy
