[111981] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Confusion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Galbraith)
Tue Feb 17 21:27:53 2009
In-Reply-To: <m2r61wzdna.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:27:44 -0600
From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 2/17/09, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>
> > I find it a shame that NAT-PT has become depreciated
>
> the ietf has recanted and is hurriedly trying to get this back on
> track. of course, to save face, the name has to be changed.
>
> > with people talking about carrier grade NATS I think combining
> > these with NAT-PT could help with the transition
>
> cgn is not a transition tool. it is a dangerous hack to deal with
> the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient
> space to number their customer edge.
>
> randy
>
>
Sounds like those consumer ISPs better get started on rolling out dual
stacks to the CPE.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbraith@gmail.com
