[111407] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marshall Eubanks)
Thu Feb 5 07:47:56 2009
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
To: "TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <018801c9878f$0256dd10$07049730$@com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:47:51 -0500
Cc: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Feb 5, 2009, at 7:41 AM, TJ wrote:
>> It doesn't solve the problem of an enterprise with more than one
>> location/network-interconnect... we can go around this rose bush
>> again and
>> again and again, but honestly, deployment of v6 happens for real
>> when there
>> is a significant business reason to deploy it, and when the real
>> concerns
> of
>> enterprises today are actually addressed.
>
> Indeed, and the IETF's answer for multi-homing (SHIM6) is a non-
> starter for
> the majority of those interested in doing so.
> Enter PI space, now available from (most of) your local RIR(s).
> Yes, also enter DFZ growth ...
>
>
That is an answer, not the answer.
You might be interested in the discussion around LISP (routing, not
language).
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg00070.html
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
Regards
Marshall
