[111406] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Thu Feb 5 07:43:01 2009
From: "TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com>
To: "'NANOG list'" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <75cb24520902042240n2be826cdx83ada59b7872e0e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:41:01 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
>It doesn't solve the problem of an enterprise with more than one
>location/network-interconnect... we can go around this rose bush again and
>again and again, but honestly, deployment of v6 happens for real when there
>is a significant business reason to deploy it, and when the real concerns
of
>enterprises today are actually addressed.
Indeed, and the IETF's answer for multi-homing (SHIM6) is a non-starter for
the majority of those interested in doing so.
Enter PI space, now available from (most of) your local RIR(s).
Yes, also enter DFZ growth ...
