[111326] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Skeeve Stevens)
Tue Feb 3 20:27:48 2009
From: "Skeeve Stevens" <skeeve@skeeve.org>
To: "'Matthew Palmer'" <mpalmer@hezmatt.org>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090204012537.GB11448@hezmatt.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:29:36 +1100
Reply-To: skeeve@skeeve.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I agree... I'd love to know where they got that from... who even wrote it?
...Skeeve
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Palmer [mailto:mpalmer@hezmatt.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2009 12:26 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 11:57:36AM +1100, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> OK.
>
> Following myself up, and referencing a link someone else gave me in
regards
> to IPv6
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network
>
> Has the entry:
>
> Private use of other reserved addresses
>
> Several other address ranges, in addition to the official private ranges,
> are reserved for other or future uses, including 1.0.0.0/8 and
2.0.0.0/8[1].
> In recent years, large companies have begun to use this address space
> internally.
[citation required]
- Matt
