[111317] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Heather Schiller)
Tue Feb 3 18:14:59 2009
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:14:45 -0500
From: Heather Schiller <heather.schiller@verizonbusiness.com>
In-reply-to: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAN5U5OuspydJheQZRk7Gfl7CgAAAEAAAABvCc9jLo4lEhdLwPQCHQGcBAAAAAA==@skeeve.org>
To: skeeve@skeeve.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> Owned by an ISP? It isn't much different than it is now.
>
> As long as you are multi-homed you can get a small allocation (/48), APNIC and ARIN have procedures for this.
>
> Yes, you have to pay for it, but the addresses will be yours, unlike the RFC1918 ranges which is akin to 2.4Ghz wireless.. lets just share and hope we never interconnect/overlap.
>
> I can't find a RFC1918 equivalent for v6 with the exception of 2001:0DB8::/32# which is the ranges that has been assigned for documentation use and is considered to NEVER be routable. In that /32 are 65536 /48's... way more than the RFC1918 we have now.
RFC4193 - Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-address-space
FC00::/7 Unique Local Unicast [RFC4193]
..maybe they should have called it RFC1918 for IPv6.
FWIW, 2001:0DB8::/32 was allocated by APNIC. Not quite the same as
being an RFC/IANA delegated/reserved netblock.
--heather
====================================================
Heather Schiller Verizon Business
Customer Security 1.800.900.0241
IP Address Management help4u@verizonbusiness.com
=====================================================
