[111304] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A5ns_Nilsson?=)
Tue Feb 3 16:19:10 2009
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:18:42 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A5ns_Nilsson?= <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com>, 'Zaid Ali' <zaid@zaidali.com>,
'Roger Marquis' <marquis@roble.com>
In-Reply-To: <483E6B0272B0284BA86D7596C40D29F984E82B67C3@PUR-EXCH07.ox.com>
Cc: "'nanog@nanog.org'" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==========DB542FB683ACECF74AD6==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
--On tisdag, tisdag 3 feb 2009 13.24.59 -0500 Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com>
wrote:
> It's not just technical. Companies are reluctant to migrate to an IP
> address owned by an ISP. We are one of those companies. If and when it
> is easy for us to apply and receive our own Ipv6 address space, we will
> look at deploying ipv6, but not until then. That's not a technical
> issue, but rather a business decision, and it's not going to change. We
> aren't depending our network resources on an external third-party,
> especially given their track record.
Renumbering will happen. Be prepared or cry louder when it happens. DNS was
invented for this, and v4 PA space is functionally equivalent to v6 here.=20
Getting PI space only pushes the inevitable a bit, while lessening the
incentives to DTRT wrt IP address mobility.=20
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson M A C H I N A
YOW!!! I am having fun!!!
--==========DB542FB683ACECF74AD6==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFJiLSy02/pMZDM1cURAgroAKCcMzdUxDne0W1QAbFgZy052/KcQgCghBt0
KtKxw8xV319TbE9AhZ3D1/I=
=Jgvc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========DB542FB683ACECF74AD6==========--
