[111269] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Hallgren)
Mon Feb 2 16:14:57 2009
From: Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr>
To: Johnny Eriksson <bygg@cafax.se>
In-Reply-To: <CMM.0.91.0.1233598959.bygg@nic.cafax.se>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:14:38 +0100
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--=-XVzWT/q+O3mkI55KXeKG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Le lundi 02 f=C3=A9vrier 2009 =C3=A0 19:22 +0000, Johnny Eriksson a =C3=A9c=
rit :
> "Paul Stewart" <pstewart@nexicomgroup.net> wrote:
>=20
> > What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a
> > closed network? It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it don=
e
> > sometimes....
>=20
> Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than
> RFC1918 gives you.=20
Use IPv6.
Cheers,
mh
> In a closed lab. Yes, it is ugly.
>=20
> Been there.
>=20
> Sometimes ugly can not be avoided.
>=20
> > Paul
>=20
> --Johnny
>=20
--=20
michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
--=-XVzWT/q+O3mkI55KXeKG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkmHYjgACgkQZNZ/rrgsqafYnACfX4yltHGsInjHUXJhsNyDcnEq
1ycAn0REGdnIFSLKLAaTcf1D+amp7TOD
=cExW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-XVzWT/q+O3mkI55KXeKG--
