[111254] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dorn Hetzel)
Mon Feb 2 14:11:13 2009
In-Reply-To: <C5AC8349.24712%leo.vegoda@icann.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:11:03 -0500
From: Dorn Hetzel <dhetzel@gmail.com>
To: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Does anyone actually use any part of 0/8 other than 0/32 for self
identification?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org> wrote:
> On 02/02/2009 10:45, "Dorn Hetzel" <dhetzel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On a related note, do you think that 0.0.0.0/8 <http://0.0.0.0/8>
> (excluding
> > 0.0.0.0/32 <http://0.0.0.0/32> , of course :) ) will be feasible for
> > allocation and use ?
>
> 0.0.0.0/8 is reserved for self-identification. See RFC 1700:
>
> (b) {0, <Host-number>}
>
> Specified host on this network. Can only be used as a
> source address.
>
> Regards,
>
> Leo Vegoda
>
>
