[111248] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dorn Hetzel)
Mon Feb 2 13:45:36 2009
In-Reply-To: <C5AC740F.246F1%leo.vegoda@icann.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:45:28 -0500
From: Dorn Hetzel <dhetzel@gmail.com>
To: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On a related note, do you think that 0.0.0.0/8 (excluding 0.0.0.0/32, of
course :) ) will be feasible for allocation and use ?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org> wrote:
> On 02/02/2009 8:10, "Bruce Grobler" <bruce@yoafrica.com> wrote:
>
> > Most ISP's, if not all, null route 1.0.0.0/8 therefore you shouldn't
> > encounter any problems using it in a private network.
>
> 1.0.0.0/8 will be allocated in the not too distant future. All currently
> unallocated unicast IPv4 /8s will be allocated in the not too distant
> future.
>
> Regards,
>
> Leo Vegoda
>
>
>
