[111244] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Johnny Eriksson)
Mon Feb 2 13:22:48 2009

Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:22:39 WET
From: Johnny Eriksson <bygg@cafax.se>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:51:58 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

"Paul Stewart" <pstewart@nexicomgroup.net> wrote:

> What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a
> closed network?  It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done
> sometimes....

Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than
RFC1918 gives you.  In a closed lab.  Yes, it is ugly.

Been there.

Sometimes ugly can not be avoided.

> Paul

--Johnny


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post