[111219] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Stewart)
Mon Feb 2 10:54:49 2009
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:51:58 -0500
In-Reply-To: <55945.192.101.252.156.1233589709.squirrel@kingfisherops.com>
From: "Paul Stewart" <pstewart@nexicomgroup.net>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a
closed network? It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done
sometimes....
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Trey Darley [mailto:trey@kingfisherops.com]
Sent: February 2, 2009 10:48 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Hi, y'all -
Some colleagues and I are running into a bit of a problem. We've been
using RFC 1918 Class A space but due to the way subnets have been
allocated we are pondering the use of public IP space. As the network in
question is strictly closed I don't anticipate any problems with this as
the addresses would be unambiguous within our environment. I'm curious
if
anyone else is doing this.
I'd be very interested in corresponding off-list with anyone who's in a
similar position.
Cheers,
--Trey
++----------------------------------------------------------------------
------++
Kingfisher Operations
Trey Darley - Principal
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to=
which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material=
. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and =
then destroy this transmission, including all attachments, without copying,=
distributing or disclosing same. Thank you."
