[109495] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 routing /48s

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Tue Nov 25 19:24:37 2008

Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:24:25 +0100
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <05e301c94f5a$41e11210$c5a33630$@net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

* alh-ietf@tndh.net (Tony Hain) [Wed 26 Nov 2008, 01:03 CET]:
> In any case, content providers can avoid the confusion if they simply put up
> a local 6to4 router alongside their 2001:: prefix, and populate DNS with
> both. Longest match will cause 2001:: connected systems to chose that dst,
> while 6to4 connected systems will chose 2002:: as the dst. There is no need

Huh?  Longest match done by web browsers and other applications?  Since 
when?


	-- Niels.

-- 
"We humans get marks for consistency. We always opt for
  civilization after exhausting the alternatives."
			-- Carl Guderian


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post