[109481] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bill fumerola)
Mon Nov 24 18:33:22 2008
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:33:09 -0800
From: bill fumerola <billf@mu.org>
To: Robert.E.VanOrmer@frb.gov
In-Reply-To: <OFC96626CF.8E97CCDC-ON85257504.007C3F42-86257504.007D12F7@frbog.frb.gov>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:46:08PM -0600, Robert.E.VanOrmer@frb.gov wrote:
> ARIN claims they are seeing /48s routed, at least in their route tables. I
> have seen some new momentum on the allocation of /32's, don't know if that
> is in response to rules like this?? Would be awefully difficult for our
> organization to come up with the rationale to need 65K /48s internally to
> justify a /32.
i can verify this. Verizon refused to route $employer's /44.
any complaints were met with "just because ARIN gives you space doesn't
mean we have to route it".
-- bill
