[108970] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Sun Nov 2 21:10:20 2008
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:10:06 -0800
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <366100670811021605o82e5364q5c5452b92eed2963@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Brandon Galbraith wrote:
> On 11/2/08, Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 04:40:20PM -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:
>>> Problem resolved?
>> https://www.sprint.net/cogent.php
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
> Seeing as Cogent is going to try tooth and nail to keep their new found Tier
> 1 status (and not pay anyone for transit), I would think this would bode
> worse for Sprint, since most of their transit customers could migrate to
> Cogent (saving $$$ and not having to face future depeerings). Just my $0.02.
>
I guess, if you like being affected by Cogent's peering spats on a
recurring basis. Are you forgetting this is not the first time?
~Seth
