[109030] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Mon Nov 3 17:44:04 2008

From: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>
To: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:42:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200811031501.mA3F1omo031556@parsley.amaranth.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


At 06:54 PM 11/2/2008, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 04:40:20PM -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:
> > Problem resolved?
>
>https://www.sprint.net/cogent.php

Since there is active litigation going on over this, it's also possible an =
attorney said, "hmmm... maybe you should wait until the judge
has rendered an opinion -- and they got to their temporary re-establishment=
."

I haven't looked, and don't know if I have access, to the court's motions/f=
ilings on this matter.

Deepak


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post