[108957] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Galbraith)
Sun Nov 2 16:33:40 2008
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 15:33:28 -0600
From: "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
To: "Joe Maimon" <jmaimon@ttec.com>
In-Reply-To: <490E1630.2080707@ttec.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 11/2/08, Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
>> On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:32 AM, Nelson Lai wrote:
>>
>> Why do some companies like Cogent get depeered relatively often and
>>> companies like Teleglobe don't even get talked about and operate in silence
>>> free from depeering?
>>>
>>
>> That's funny. One of the first networks to de-peer Cogent was Teleglobe.
>> They re-peered after a bit.
>>
>> The next obvious question is: When Sprint, Telia & L3 de-peering Cogent,
>> it causes a lot of news in the press & noise on NANOG, so why didn't you
>> know Teleglobe depeered Cogent?
>>
>
> Imagine the news had they all depeered cogent at the same time.
Imagine the lawsuits and government regulation had that occurred.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbraith@gmail.com
