[108956] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Maimon)
Sun Nov 2 16:12:24 2008
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:05:52 -0500
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <978AF989-64D5-4A00-93F1-0BF79BBA05DA@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:32 AM, Nelson Lai wrote:
>
>> Why do some companies like Cogent get depeered relatively often and
>> companies like Teleglobe don't even get talked about and operate in
>> silence free from depeering?
>
> That's funny. One of the first networks to de-peer Cogent was
> Teleglobe. They re-peered after a bit.
>
> The next obvious question is: When Sprint, Telia & L3 de-peering Cogent,
> it causes a lot of news in the press & noise on NANOG, so why didn't you
> know Teleglobe depeered Cogent?
Imagine the news had they all depeered cogent at the same time.
