[107909] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.)
Wed Sep 17 16:54:11 2008
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:53:35 -0500
From: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
CC: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKEJFPMAC.davids@webmaster.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> Some people would really like email to be as reliable as possible, even if
> that means they have to wade through a lot of spam.
By what twisted logic can a system where desired email is found when "
they have to wade through a lot of spam"?
Have you ever inadvertently deleted a desired item in the middle of a
delete-yes-delete-yes-delete-yes-delete-yes-delete-yes-delete-yes
sequence that went on for "a lot of spam"?
How many times? Did you recover all of the desired items? How do you
know that?
To me a reliable system is one that delivers what I want and only what I
want every time. And having to pick the pepper out of the flysh*t is
not my idea of "reliable".
