[107892] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Skywing)
Wed Sep 17 12:56:22 2008
From: Skywing <Skywing@valhallalegends.com>
To: Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:55:49 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Putting things in the automated bogon feeds (e.g. Team Cymru) that are not =
strictly bogons (unallocated addresses) is likely to very quickly erode tru=
st in those services, if that is what you are suggesting.
- S
-----Original Message-----
From: Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 09:26
To: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 23:36:20 *Hobbit* wrote:
> you expect them to apply a null route?
>
> Well, I *have* been talking somewhat idealistically here and
> there with this crop of questions, but frankly I thought in the
> 2 or 3 years I was ignoring the list that the NETWORK OPERATORS
> ostensibly in custody of the intertubes would have pulled things
> together a little better and grown enough of a pair to firmly
> state "this crap stops here and now" and make it happen.
:-) Speaking as an observer only, and not as someone who, other than at my
own edge, could make a significant impact on the result.
Seems to me getting that IP space on a bogon list could be enough to make a
serious dent.
