[107889] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Wed Sep 17 09:02:23 2008
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:01:45 +0200
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Matthew Moyle-Croft" <mmc@internode.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <68A8CC6C-2284-4C2B-96DE-45B162D89FE6@internode.com.au>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Looks like PIE got themselves a /22 in spamhaus -
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL67906
_________quote__________
206.223.144.0/22 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)
17-Sep-2008 09:57 GMT | SR04
Pacific Internet Exchange LLC. NT Technology ; nttec.com
http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS32335
Hosted/routed Scott Richter AND Alan Ralsky - now decided to pick up
Intercage/Atrivo. Perhaps someone does not read the news?
http://news.google.com/news?q=intercage
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=636
We hope that's the case and this is not a knowing routing decision.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Matthew Moyle-Croft
<mmc@internode.com.au> wrote:
>
> On 16/09/2008, at 10:17 PM, *Hobbit* wrote:
>
>> So in cases like this where the community appears to agree that there's
>> a consistently bad apple, what's preventing everyone from simply
>> nullrouting the netblocks in question and imposing the death penalty?
>
> Dunno - but something did occur to me this morning on the drive into work:
