[107498] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: BCP38 dismissal

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (james)
Thu Sep 4 13:13:41 2008

From: "james" <james@jdfogg.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:14:39 -0500
Reply-To: james@jdfogg.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:24 AM, James Jun wrote:
> > Indeed... In today's internet, protecting your own box
> > (cp-policer/  control
> > plane filtering) is far more important IMO than
> > implementing BCP38   when much
> > of attack traffic comes from legitimate IP sources
> > anyway (see   botnets).
> 
> 
> I'm sorry, but nonsense statements such as these burn the
> blood.    Sure, yes, protecting yourself is so much more
> important than   protecting anyone else.
> 
> Anyone else want to stand up and join the "I am an
> asshole" club?


OK, I'm an asshole.
I'm sure BCP38 can prove to be useful, but I'll never drop
my shields.

I guess being an asshole is not so bad given that I have
plenty of company.




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post